The Lessons Elvis Didn't Learn From Beatles One

Tags: 

RCA is desperately marketing Elvis 30 # 1 Hits as the King's version of Beatles One, which is incredibly odd (and wrong) for several reasons.

First, they failed to learn the number one lesson the Beatles disc taught us. If you compile a greatest hits package without gimmicks, it works. Elvis' collection has a huge gimmick in the new A Little Less Conversation, which is certainly more of a JXL song with Elvis samples than a true Elvis song. Sure, some folks will groove to it now, and they should (it is a pretty good song), but the truth is that it sounds horribly out of place on this album, and a few months from now, people will either skip straight to the song or end the disc before it plays, as it is obviously not part of the album. It is a gimmick, a gimmick that Beatles One showed you didn't have to stoop to.

Ignoring sound quality, Beatles One was a pretty good compilation slightly hindered by one fact; you really cannot thoroughly represent the Beatles using only their number one hits. No Strawberry Fields Forever, no Please Please Me, no psychedelic pop, no definitive collection. While this was a minor thorn in the side of the Beatles compilation, it is a major Achilles' heel for the Elvis disc. This approach would not work to cover Bob Dylan's career, and it does not work to represent Elvis' art well at all. To be blunt, this paints a very one-sided view of Elvis, and not at an angle that flatters him best. You take away the Sun singles, the country songs, the rocker, the gospel singer, the comeback years (well, for the most part, at least), heck, you even take away Kentucky Rain, and you simply have Elvis the pop star. Not that he was a bad pop star at all - He wasn't. But he certainly was much more than a pop star, and arguably he was at his best when connecting deeper to his roots.

In fact, the Dylan comparison is very apt. I would love to see a two-disc Essential Elvis Presley collection put together by Legacy. That would come much closer to capturing Elvis the artist as opposed to Elvis the Icon. And frankly, if Elvis is ever going to get the respect of the younger generations, it will only be because they stop seeing the icon and begin seeing the artist. That is the major flaw of this Elvis disc. The Elvis being presented is the same old Velvet Elvis the world at large, including the kids, know. The real Elvis is still locked outside the building.

There have been so many one and two disc Elvis compilations. In fact, there have been too damn many. Maybe some day, we'll see a concise, real Elvis overview put together right.

Alright, my spleen is vented...

Damn! I was just about to purchase Elvis 30 # 1...

Wonder if the new Stones greatest hits album is worth buying as well?

Decisions, decisions...

Go for the Stones discs. Good stuff well done.

The Elvis collection isn't horrid, just a severely missed opportunity. They also used several remixes, which ain't too cool in my book. I mean, the songs hit #1 as they were. Do I really think some engineer today knows better than Elvis and the entire nation did back then?

No.

The Stones' 40 Licks should make anyone interested in the Stones very *very* happy, I think...

Shalom, y'all!

L. Bangs

Wonderful! Concisely said. Elvis had soul, and anyone blinded by the jumpsuit, the impersonators, or the Ed Sullivan appearances is missing out on a huge and vital piece of rock and roll (and music) heritage.

On an unrelated note, I think anyone with sense should go and out purchase Rubber Soul over One. What a singles and album band. So much so, I'm being superfluous just saying it once. The only reason I bought One (and this is a dodgy reason, no doubt) is to help the disc become the best-selling album of all time. But One does have its purposes, and who am I to question them?

I just finished scanning the running order for the upcoming release, Elvis 2nd to None, and truth be told, the second collection seems to be a direct reponse to many of the issues brought up here. In fact, I think (though I've only just looked at it) it may display the many sides of Elvis better than the first collection did!

It is too bad the label doesn't combine the songs from both discs into a double-disc release with the songs in chronological order. THAT would be a terrific introduction to the artist.

I'm just a-ramblin' here...

Shalom, y'all!

L. Bangs