[yearly] seen in 2003
- loved:
- American Beauty (1999)
- Bowling For Columbine (2002)
- The Brave Little Toaster (1987) (again)
- Signs (2002) (again)
- The Cameraman (1928)
- The Man Who Wasn't There (2001)
- Amelie (2001) (again)
- Being John Malkovich (1999)
- Metropolis (1925)
- Network (1976)
- Field of Dreams (1989) (again)
- quite enjoyed:
- The Matrix Reloaded (2003)
- Confidence (2003)
- enjoyed:
- Barbershop (2002)
- The Bourne Identity (2002) (again)
- Spiderman (2002)
- Wet Hot American Sumnmer (2001) (again)
- Groundhog Day (1993)
- Shakespeare in Love (1998)
- Bad Company (2002) (again)
- Haiku Tunnel (2002)
- Igby Goes Down (2002)
- Scotland PA (2001)
- Anger Management (2003)
- Free At Last (2003) (DVD)
- tolerated:
- One Hour Photo (2002)
- Old School (2003)
- enjoyed for inherent camp value:
- Big Trouble in Little China (1986)
One Hour Photo. I'm not sure the movie knew what it wanted to be. Robin Williams was compelling, but the explanation at the end for his actions came so quickly and was so vague as to be unsatisfying, given the rich potential for mental exploration (the dreams, his interaction with families and co-workers). And the only character given any development, it seemed to me, was Robin's. If this was the point, fine. But he obviously thought the family offered something for him to collect their photos in particular. Jake feels pity for Sy, he indulges him, and then what? We don't get the family's reactions to Sy's increasingly desperate actions. If they are ceasing to be the perfect family he imagines, then why do they remain 2D reactives even after the revelation of Will's affair? My friends, brother, and girlfriend all seemed to enjoy it more than me, so I guess I should wait before passing any kind of final judgment.
Scotland PA: a satisfactory Very Bad Things. This is the kind of black comedy I can enjoy, although knowing that the movie was based on MacBeth made things distracting for all of us who watched it, since we were mentally lining up the on-screen events/people with their Shakespearean counterparts.
The Matrix Reloaded Minus the orgiastic Zion scene, this was a darn fine movie, and I was gearing myself up for a sucky movie. Some parts were talky-talky, to the point of dusting me with the Wachowski's convoluted and self-negating leaps of thought, but every fight brought at least one giddy grin, and that didn't happen for the first movie. There were at least a couple times that they lost me, to wit: If Agent Smith could copy himself so often, then where the heck was all of his copies on the 18-wheelers? Reloaded vascillated between a one-on-one showdown with agents or a Neo v. Everyone scenario. Still, the element of doubt introduced about the Oracle was a great touch, and I hope that the next movie sees fit to play up Morpheus' struggle against sticking to the prophecy (and thus, Neo), which was his lodestone for nearly two movies. Very nice film, not as much talking as I was warned about (or at least, the talking was done by interesting secondaries (particularly Randall Duk Kim's Keymaker and Lambert Wilson as Merovingian). Maybe future viewings will dim my surprise somewhat, but for now I'm actually getting excited about the third film.
Man, Old School wasn't no good at all. Colin and I just saw it cos it was that or Tears of the Sun. Weird as it is, Will Ferrell and his holding-back-the-mental-instability persona actually provided most of the too-few bright spots. I enjoyed seeing Craig Kilborn's small role as a smarmy boyfriend, but mostly because it was Kils, and not because he did anything really memorable.
I forgot about Confidence. Saw it in April on campus. It was well-put together, although not so intricate that my roommates didn't pick out the ending halfway through the film. Ed Burns was pretty bland, and he and Rachel Weisz had little chemistry, whether in love or loathing, but Dustin Hoffman's dangerouly loopy crime boss and Andy Garcia's rumpled Fed (nearly unrecognizable to me, but then I don't get out to the movies that much) were compelling secondary characters. The characters were at the mercy of the plot, but thankfully the plot was intricate without hitting the point of ridiculousness.
Says I.








We rented The Brave Little Toaster for my daughter when she was somewhere around 3 or 4. Unfortunately at the time she was terrified of vacuum cleaners, so she didn't make it past the opening credits when the vacuum comes charging at the screen with a scowl on it's face. Whoops! :-)
yeah, that movie had plenty of scary moments when I was younger. those last two songs in particular! jeez.
Ah, yes; another Metropolis lover.
Have I mentioned I LOVE that movie?
Shalom, y'all!
L. Bangs
I would expect nothing less from ye. We watched it in a liberal arts discussion course (Modernism and the City), and nearly my whole class despised it. I was crushed. I just sat there silently while people were laughing and throwing snide comments around.
A real shame.
Wow, that's really depressing, actually. I recently compiled my favorite 100 films, and Metropolis is a top 25 film for me.
This week has been depressing enough. I'll just pretend I never saw this post... :)
Well, I'm thrilled that you enjoyed it!
Shalom, y'all!
L. Bangs
is your 100 films list up? I looked for it but I don't see it.
No, I have become a slacker - I've started posting the list awhile back, but I haven't updated or added to it in quite some time. The list exists on my hard drive, but the comments are trapped in my little brain for the moment.
If I don't get around to adding more soon, I might just post the list and add some flesh to the skeleton as time allows.
Shalom, y'all!
L. Bangs
Wow, you're off to a great start, seeing 19 movies and either loving or enjoying all of them. I should start using your recommendation service!
I just saw Amelie for the first time and I'm totally with you on that one. Have you seen any of Jeunet's other movies like Delicatessen or City of Lost Children? They are both quite a bit darker, but they are also both terrific. I know they both have a following here at Listology, but I think CoLC is generally preferred (although I'm a Delicatessen man, personally).
While I agree with you totally on Amelie, we miss each other on The Man Who Wasn't There. Ah well, can't win 'em all. :-) Anyway, those are the two movies that leap out at me for "biggest agreement" and "biggest disagreement." Just thought I'd share.
well, thanks much for the contributions. I agree, I've hit a spell of movies I've quite enjoyed. but I think I need to fix "Big Trouble..." hold on...
So there indeed. "Big Trouble" was a family experience (I was the only one who hadn't seen it). Really reminded me of Army of Darkness. There were many, many times I looked at my brother and said "This should be Bruce talking, not Kurt."
I'm so glad you've seen Amelie! Such a wonderful movie. I've heard that Amelie's Montmarte isn't quite so fancifully ornamented in reality, but the I was totally carried away by the spirit of the film. Inventive camerawork, expressive colors (especially in the apartment), and great instrumental accompaniment. And the large supporting cast was managed well, in my opinion.
Y'know, I think a large reason why I enjoyed The Man Who Wasn't There is that I had expectations that were contrary to the actual style of the film. I expected Thorton's barber to be a schlumpy sad sack, not the quiet schemer he ends up as. The noir twists were welcome, too. I will say that the ending seemed to stretch for a bit; they wrapped up a lot of stuff I didn't think was necessary. But on the whole, I found it engrossing.
I think of Big Trouble in Little China as one of Kurt Russell's defining roles (I agree with your new classification for that movie, BTW) so it's hard for me to think of replacing him, but The Mighty Chin himself would certainly be my first alternate!
So've you seen Delicatessen or City of Lost Children?
no, I haven't. I saw Venus Beauty Institute last year, but Ms. Tautou just had a supporting role. if my spring break isn't cut short by a research paper, I'll start with Delicatessen (video store willing).
I ultimately decided I liked One Hour Photo but it took me a little while to come around to that way of thinking.
yeah, jury's still out for me, I guess...
am I being too hard on the characteerization? If everyone is supposed to be secondary to Sy, then maybe I should rethink my reaction.
No, I think that's a good critique of the movie. I ended up liking it (mildly) in spite of that.