2004
Submitted by Kza on Sat, 06/05/2004 - 09:09
Tags:
- Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Michel Gondry) [97]
- Hero (Zhang Yimou) [97; up from 95]
- Primer (Shane Carruth) [94]
- Dogville (Lars von Trier) [92]
- The Incredibles (Brad Bird) [87]
- Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring (Kim Ki-Duk) [86]
- Spartan (David Mamet) [85]
- Dawn of the Dead (Zack Snyder) [84]
- Cowards Bend The Knee (Guy Maddin) [83; contigent on a Seattle release, otherwise it's 2003]
- I ♥ Huckabees (David O. Russell) [81]
- The Saddest Music in the World (Guy Maddin) [80; downgraded from 81]]
- Sideways (Alexander Payne) [80]
- Mean Creek (Jacob Aaron Estes) [80]
- Kill Bill Vol. 2 (Quentin Tarantino) [80]
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Alfonso CuarĂ³n) [79; up from 71]
- Spider-Man 2 (Sam Raimi) [79]
- Shaun of the Dead (Edgar Wright) [78]
- The Best of Youth (Marco Tullio Giordano) [75] (may not be a 2004 release; depends on Miramax)
- Ocean's Twelve (Steven Soderbergh) [73]
- Hellboy (Guillermo Del Toro) [73]
- Million Dollar Baby (Clint Eastwood) [72]
- I, Robot (Alex Proyas) [68]
- The Brown Bunny (Vincent Gallo) [67]
- Hotel Rwanda (Terry George) [67]
- Super Size Me (Morgan Spurlock) [67]
- Troy (Wolfgang Petersen) [67]
- The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (Wes Anderson) [66]
- The Butterfly Effect (Eric Bress & J. Mackye Gruber) [66]
- Garden State (2004, Zach Braff) [64]
- Napoleon Dynamite (Jared Hess) [62]
- Stander (Bronwen Hughes) [62]
- Infernal Affairs (2004, Wai Keung Lau & Siu Fai Mak) [61]
- Tokyo Godfathers (Satoshi Kon) [60]
- Metallica: Some Kind of Monster (Joe Berlinger & Bruce Sinofsky) [60]
- Head-On (Fatih Akin) [59]
- The Day After Tomorrow (Roland Emmerich) [58]
- 13 Going on 30 (Gary Winick) [58]
- Twentynine Palms (Bruno Dumont) [57]
- Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle (Danny Leiner) [56]
- Spanglish (James L. Brooks) [56]
- Closer (Mike Nichols) [56]
- Mean Girls (Mark Waters) [54]
- National Treasure (Jon Turteltaub) [53]
- Absolut (Romed Wyder) [53]
- The Aviator (Martin Scorsese) [50]
- Collateral (Michael Mann) [47]
- The Woodsman (Nicole Kassel) [47]
- She Hate Me (Spike Lee) [46]
- Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning (Grant Harvey) [45]
- Secret Window (David Koepp) [42]
- The Bourne Supremacy (Paul Greengrass) [40]
- Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (Kerry Conran) [40]
- Finding Neverland (Marc Forster) [38]
- Friday Night Lights (Peter Berg) [33]
- The Terminal (Steven Spielberg) [30]
- The Village (M. Night Shyamalan) [17; I think the honeymoon's over]
- Saw (James Wan) [15]
- Beyond the Sea (2004, Kevin Spacey) (f) [13]
- The Chronicles of Riddick (David Twohy) (v) [8]
- House of Flying Daggers (Zhang Yimou) (v) [DNF]
Author Comments:
The number is a 1-100 rating. It breaks down roughly:
100-80 (Highly recommended)
79-60 (Recommended)
59-40 (Some redeeming qualities)
39-20 (Not recommended)
19-0 (Awful)








I shall have to clone this list, Mr. Kent M. Beeson of Western Civilization. Just noticed you have not listed the finest film released so far this year. What gives? Are you anti-Lars?
Actually, I'm not anti-Lars, despite the fact that I reeeely didn't like BJORK AT THE END OF HER ROPE. No, the sad fact is that DOGVILLE either a) hasn't shown up in the Seattle area yet or b) somehow, someway, it came and went and I missed it, like waiting and waiting for the #18 bus and letting your mind wander on the day just ended and the day that is to come and then realizing, too late, that the bus just leaving was yours.
God, I hope it wasn't b).
Aww, DANCER IN THE DARK is a great film, but different strokes for different folks. DOGVILLE is really a lot more of the same, only with a twist, so I wonder how you'll respond to it. I have a feeling that it has already come and gone from Seattle, because there are reviews online from Seattle-area pubs circa the middle of April.
Speaking of Lars & Seattle, I see that THE FIVE OBSTRUCTIONS is coming soon to your fair city. Bastard!
Damn it all to hell, DOGVILLE apparently opened April 16. I really have no idea how I missed it. And it didn't make a stop at our local cheapie ($3) theater, which tends to give art and foreign movies as much attention as blockbusters. (Unless I missed it there, as well, but I tend to religiously check their listings.)
FIVE OBSTRUCTIONS is at SIFF right now AFAIK (probably woulda went if I had more money to blow), but it's supposed to get a reg'lar release, I think.
I would kill to have a $3 theatre that shows art/foreign stuff. FYI: I have the DOGVILLE DVD, if you're interested in a collector-to-collector VHS dub; I already promised one to Steve & have to get on it when time permits.
Aw man, I used to be able to make VHS dubs from DVDs. I managed to put CODE UNKNOWN, CURE, PULSE, and RING 1 & 2 on tape before my LOTR EE killed the player.
Anywho--is the DVD not coming out for awhile? I think I can wait, unless you think I shouldn't :-)
August 24th is the street date for the American release, I believe. Based on your feelings about DANCER IN THE DARK, I'd say you can wait.
Okay, so what's up with Spider-Man 2: Electric Boogaloo, or are you saving that for a Hellbox post?
Yeah, I try to do a weekly recap on Sat. night (sometimes Sun), so I thought I'd try to compose some thoughts for that. Short version: Not as... confident, I guess, as the first. Must think on it more.
I wasn't overly impressed by the original, so my expectations are pretty low for this one. Still, I'll be at the multiplex tomorrow to check it out. Please tell me that the CGI looks better this time around.
See, everyone says they're better, and I suppose there's a little more detail to Spider-Man, but it's still clearly CGI, so I don't know what people are on about. It never bothered me in the first one, though. I'd say that Dr. Octopus ends up being more CGI'd (not just the arms, but the whole body) than the Green Goblin was, however.
I don't know, I agree with Matt. The first movie looked and acted a lot like a big budget episode of The Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I laughed out loud at the CGI and never did understand why Peter couldn't save the world and get laid by Mary Jane too.
Well, then, I'd be terribly surprised if you (or Matt, for that matter) like #2. I sincerely doubt it would allay any of your issues.
Wow, THE VILLAGE is *that* bad, is it? Should I even bother seeing it in the theatre? Not sure I can go until the DVD release without accidentally reading about the "twist" ending.
It was bobbing around the 40s for most of the running time, and that was being generous; the big twist brought it down into the 20s, and the coda, which is absolutely noxious, took it down even further. Actually, on second thought, that's not correct. As I left the theater, I thought about giving it a 25; when I checked my ratings and realized that that would be 6 points higher than THE FURY, I dropped it down to 17. I'd much rather watch THE FURY again; hell, I'd take IDENTITY over this.
I'd say don't bother about it, unless you're really curious or a completist. But ultimately, Scott, you're a smart guy -- I bet not only could you figure out the twist ending, you could probably think of a better one.
I'm curious mainly because it's playing at the local Landmark, which is the only theatre in town that I have extremely easy access to. Guess I should take in BEFORE SUNSET instead.
Hmmm...if the THE VILLAGE's twist is what I think it is (that the village is some sorta secret project in modern-day or future America), I can probably skip it altogether.
Spoilers related to previous post (which only make sense in context, but I thought I'd cover my butt anyway):
Ha! I knew it! I knew you were smarter than the av-ver-age filmmaker.
Not only are you correct, you did better than I did; I didn't even consider it could be the 10th word in your spoiler (I was sure it was the 12th word).
Thing is, if MNS had ditched his twist-ending crutch and acknowledged the truth of the setting early on, it might've been interesting.
I'm not going to see "The Village", but I couldn't resist finding out about the secret twist ending. Could you explain this a little further? Is it some kind of scientific experiment? If so, what is it for?
For AJDaGreat: The Secret of the Village Revealed!
Actually, it's not a scientific experiment. What happens is: some twenty years previous, William Hurt, Sigourney Weaver and the other "elders" were going to a counseling center because people they loved died from violence. William Hurt's father, who was shot to death, was a billionaire and owned a wildlife preserve. Hurt convinces everyone to create a utopia-style village in the middle of the preserve, where they can raise children and no one will ever find them. (There's a bit of throw-away dialogue at the end that explains that Hurt bought off the airlines, etc. so that no planes would fly across.) The Elders then tell the children (who were born in the village) that a mythical race of monsters lives in the woods outside the village, so they won't stray. (Hurt and others periodically dress up as a monster--which looks like a anthropomorphic porcupine--to scare the kids.)
Now, all of this is pretty interesting: the Elders use fear to control their children, much like their fear controlled them to set up the village, and try as they might, they can't keep violence from spoiling their utopia. But really, everything I said is all that you really learn in the movie. They never get any deeper than that. And although one of the children gets past the woods to the modern-day outside, she's blind and it's not really clear that she understands what she sees. Finally, it was pretty clear to me that MNS, ultimately, endorses what the Elders have done, which I found abhorrent, although I suppose my interpretation is debatable.
Um, sweet. Thanks for the spoilers!
No prob! Sorry about the editorializing tone at the end; as if you couldn't tell, this movie really bugged me!
The movie was pretty dissapointing, but I had the twist ruined for me before I saw it.
I did, however, love Bryce Dallas Howard.
Howard was the only thing about the movie I liked; she's super-cute, and a pretty good actress, considering what she had to work with here. I foresee the Big Time for her.
Yup. Although I haven't seen DA VILLAGE, I'm interested to see how Howard handles her role as Grace in DOGVILLE VOL. 2 aka MANDERLAY.
Whoa whoa whoa whoa! Taking it a bit far, are we? I mean, I know "The Poor Little Village That Was Menaced By Some Bizarre Warthog-Looking Creatures That Look Even Lamer than the Alien in 'Signs'" is awful. You'll find no quarrel with me there.
But... calling it worse than "Ifrickindentity"? The twist in "The Village" is dumb, but "Identity" is the King Grand Poobah of retarded screenplay developments. (Then again, I keep hearing that the twist in the tail of the upcoming "Haute Tension" is even worse...)
The sad, sad truth for me is that, IDENTITY, quite possibly one of the worst movies of the 21st century, is more fun to watch than THE VILLAGE, aka BRENT BOZELL'S WET DREAM OF A MOVIE. [Two points more fun, to be exact :-) ] I guess, given the choice between nihilism and a sanctimonious defense of innocence, I'm a Nihilism Guy.
"Hero" is officially coming out! August 27th, baby! YESSSSSSS!
And you can add "Cowards Bend the Knee" to this list now -- it got its NYC release this last Friday.
Have you seen Hero yet, on DVD, or will this be your first time?
Also: When I got into this game, I never set up a process by which I determine whether a relatively new movie should get slotted into this year or that. Is Cowards gonna get released in other parts of the country--to put it better, is it going to be distributed?--or is this a one-shot deal in NY? If it's one-shot, I'm hesitant to call it a 2004 movie.
It has a distributor (Wellspring, I believe), but because of the niche nature of the film, I'm fairly doubtful that it'll expand beyond NY and LA. So maybe you won't include it after all... :-)
And this'll be my first "Hero" experience. I can't wait.
Well, if it has a distributor, seems there's an off-chance it'll find its way up here to Seattle; the Grand Illusion did have a Maddin retro a few years ago (at the time of Ice Nymphs or whatever it's called), and Saddest Music played here as well.
Maybe that's my criteria: if it plays Seattle!
Oh, and I can't wait for Hero, either. I especially can't wait to see it from a decent seat.
I've probably asked this before, but would someone not into martial arts flicks (me) enjoy Hero Not Starring Dustin Hoffman? Just wondering, 'cuz it opens in New Orleans on the 27th and, although I've been avoiding theatres this summer, I might check it out if indeed it is worth it.
Here's one where I'm totally willing to take the leap and say go for it, even though you aren't into the martial arts thang. It's nothing like CTHD, I don't think; it's really a visual feast, and the time-jumping, Rashomon-esque plot kept me on my toes. I'd hope you see it, just so you can see my favorite scene of the year, the fight between Maggie Cheung and Zhang Ziyi. It's like a gorgeous painting come to life. (Er, and then the people in it start hitting each other.)
Luckily for me, Hero will be playing at a single screen, residential theatre a quarter of a mile from work, so I should be able to see it on the big screen. The trailer does look fantastic.
Okay, so just saw "Cowards" (short review: awesome), and turns out the distributor is Zeitgeist. So, to answer your question about the possibility of it coming to Seattle, I'll ask another question: Did "The Corporation" make it to Seattle? 'Cause Zeitgeist handled that too.
Why yes, yes it did. Still might be playing, actually.
I'll take a big leap of faith and put it on the 2004 list. Seems to me there's a enough of a Maddin fan base here to warrant at least a week's worth of showings.
How were the crowds for The Incredibles? I don't like crowds, at least not ones filled with young children. Wait, are you still in the states?
Yeah, I keep meaning to get up a quick blog entry to let everyone know I'm in TN for a few days, visiting my parents. If you look out your window to the north... that's me, waving :-)
The crowds were... okay, not bad. A crying baby near the beginning, but other than that, generally okay, considering how many kids there were.
I need to see this. Maybe tomorrow or next weekend. Allegedly Primer is opening here on the 12th; I have a hard time believing that the local Landmark is actually gonna show it, so I have my fingers crossed.
Now i know this may be juping the gun but i would say that Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a conteneder for the best movie ever made! glad too see it at the top 0f 2004 here
Pretty awesome, isn't it? Did it just get released in the UK, or are you just now catching up with it?
it came out in August / September in the theares but i missed it and it came out on dvd last month, thats where i saw it. its a great movie, carrey is great. one thing that always makes me luagh is that i NEVER think when i see kate in that film, i NEVER think "dammit, tis that snobby annoying rich girl from titanic" its impossible to tell! lol she's a whole new person in this film.
What didn't work in 'The Woodsman'?