2009 film log (Marchon)

Tags: 
  • November

  • +Henri-Georges Clouzot: Les diaboliques (1955) TCM - this is suspense; the film as a whole does not drive like some Hitchcock films, but when it comes to the suspense, it is up there with Hitchcock’s Rear Window finale, where you are inside the film watching and waiting for what is around the next corner. This is sadly more like The Usual Suspects, in that when you see it once you have seen it a thousand times, but that one viewing is worth a thousand other good films!
  • August

  • Michael Curtiz & William Keighley: The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) TCM
  • John Ford: Stagecoach (1939) TCM
  • July

  • Alexander Mackendrick: Sweet Smell of Success (1957) TCM
  • Delbert Mann: Marty (1955) TCM
  • Alfred Hitchcock: Rebecca (1940) TCM - meh
  • David Lean: The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) TCM
  • Stanley Kubrick: Lolita (1962) TCM
  • François Truffaut: The 400 Blows (1959) TCM - the film ended better than i thought it would, but i am no fan of French New Wave (of the 3 films i have seen that have been said to define the genre, but i plan on watching all the other major films produced within the genre before i start cursing its existence), nor Scorsese who directs in a similar fashion.
  • Orson Welles: The Lady from Shanghai (1948) TCM - an awkward movie, and not well edited, but a great ending, the one thing Welles REALLY knew how to do - to tell a story.
  • Ernest Lubitsch: Ninotchka (1939) TCM
  • June

  • 6/16
  • Victor Erice: The Spirit of the Beehive (1973) TCM - i liked watching this film, but do not think it is great, and will probably not revisit
  • 6/13
  • John Huston: The Maltese Falcon (1941) TCM
  • Woody Allen: The Purple Rose of Cairo (1985) TCM
  • 6/12
  • *Howard Hawks: Rio Bravo (1959) TCM
  • May

  • 5/16
  • Woody Allen: Sleeper (1973) download
  • Karel Reisz: Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1960) TCM
  • George Miller: Mad Max (1979) TCM
  • 5/9
  • Curtis Hanson: Wonder Boys (1979) rented
  • April

  • 4/4
  • Don Siegal & Sam Peckinpah: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) TCM
  • 4/3
  • Alfred Hitchcock: The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) TCM
  • 4/2
  • Fred McLeod: Forbidden Planet (1956) TCM - not a bad movie, and an interesting soundtrack.
  • 4/1
  • William Wyler: Roman Holiday (1953) TCM
  • March

  • 3/31
  • Alfred Hitchcock: Shadow of a Doubt (1943) TCM
  • 3/29
  • Tom DeCerchio: Celtic Pride (1996) AMC - i have seen this movie either 64 or 68 times now, too many!
  • Alfred Hitchcock: The 39 Steps (1935) PBS
  • 3/28
  • Charlie Kaufman: Synecdoche, New York (2008) download
  • 3/26
  • **Theo Angelopoulos: O Thiassos (The Travelling Players) (1975) download
  • 3/24
  • Alfred Hitchcock: Blackmail (1929) TCM
  • 3/23
  • ***Carol Reed: The Third Man (1949) TCM
  • *George Stevens: A Place in the Sun (1951) TCM
  • 3/22
  • Monte Hellman: Two-Lane Blacktop (1971) TCM
  • Mel Brooks: Blazing Saddles (1974) AMC
  • Budd Boetticher: Ride Lonesome (1959) TCM
  • 3/21
  • David Lean: Doctor Zhivago (1965) TCM
  • **Andrei Tarkovsky: Solaris (1972) TCM
  • 3/20
  • Stanley Donen: Seven Brides for Seven Brothers (1954) TCM
  • 3/19
  • Jerry Lewis: The Nutty Professor (1963) TCM - they used and abused Technicolor on this film, wow, this must have been an eysore for some and ecstasy for the rest.
  • George Cukor: The Philadelphia Story (1940) TCM
  • 3/18
  • **Yasujiro Ozu: Tokyo Story (1953) TCM
  • Frank Capra: It Happened One Night (1934) TCM
  • 3/17
  • **Hal Ashby: Harold and Maude (1971) TCM
  • Alfred Hitchcock: Frenzy (1972) TCM
  • 3/16
  • Edgar G. Ulmer: Detour (1945) TCM
  • **Alfred Hitchcock: Psycho (1960) TCM
  • Alfred Hitchcock: Spellbound (1945) TCM
  • Michael Curtiz: Mildred Pierce (1945) TCM
  • 3/15
  • Tay Garnett: The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946) TCM
  • Fred Zinneman: From Here to Eternity (1953) TCM
  • Nicholas Ray: Johnny Guitar (1954) TCM
  • Frank Capra: Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936) TCM
  • 3/13
  • ***Orson Welles: The Magnificent Ambersons (1942) TCM
  • 3/10
  • Michael Wadleigh: Woodstock (1970) library
  • 3/9
  • Victor Fleming, George Cukor & Sam Wood: Gone With the Wind (1939) library
  • Howard Hawks: Bringing Up Baby(1938) library
  • 3/8
  • Michael Curtiz: Angels with Dirty Faces (1938) library
  • George Stevens: Gunga Din (1939) library
  • 3/7
  • Tod Browning: Dracula (1931) library
  • 3/1
  • Frank Capra: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939) TCM
  • John Huston: The African Queen (1951) TCM

what did you think of Lolita? I still find the pacing to be a bit too slow mostly, but it's brimming with wonderful observations. Sellers and Mason are hilarious too. Winters plays such a good idiot.

meh, i did not care for the movie. it was fairly boring, too slow, and only suggestive - i never got the feeling that Humbert and Lolita were actually doing what the movie vaguely hinted at throughout. i hated Sellers in the movie. he supposedly improvised most/some of his lines/characters which annoyed me. i liked him much more in Dr. Strangelove - the acting between characters was much more fluid and natural. Winters does play a good idiot!

I felt like there was some sly jabs at the dynamics of family sexuality - Humbert’s secret sexual longings masking as Fatherly protectiveness or Charlotte punishing Lolita out of sexual frustration with Humbert. I mean notice how liberal she is with her when she thinks she’s going to get laid, but after being rejected by Hum she turns into a tyrant. It’s also funny how similar Charlotte and Lolita are to one another. They both have pictures of men on their wall that they worship, they’re both quite moronic and immature, and they both have their bodies as their one true asset. And the fact that they’re so similar is what makes Humbert look pretty silly. He’s constantly deriding Charlotte, yet is completely in love with Lolita because of her looks, thus pointing out that attraction (ie sex) is really what is important when it comes to love. Personally I love Sellers in this film, he’s actually my favourite part though I can see how he’d be an acquired taste. His character is very important I think in contrasting with Humbert. Because of their fixation on young girls they are both perhaps ‘sleaze balls’, but Sellers is a lot more care free and libertine than the comparatively repressed Humbert Humbert. Quilty unabashedly brags about his sexual adventures and even wants to film them (“He wanted me to cooperate like the others into doing some sort of…I dunno…some kind of an art movie.” “An art movie…ugh.”) He accepts it as part of his nature and isn’t ashamed. Humbert on the other hand, is very ashamed of his longings and practically tortures himself with his fantasies (by not acting them out); notice how it is Lolita who initiates their first ‘encounter’. And ultimately the movie recognizes that love is really just a game (a sometimes fatal game) where there’s a winner and a loser, first Charlotte loses to Hum and then Hum loses to Lolita. I mean really, who took advantage of who here? It totally flips the politically correct notion on top of it’s head. Being a huge Kubrick fan, I’ve watched Lolita a lot over the past few years. It’s got so many great ideas, but it’s really kind of stale in the end. Perhaps that’s fitting though. It seems like the entire film is shot through Humbert’s eyes (I mean, wasn’t Charlotte a little too dumb?) So by that token, Humbert would have wanted a sort of detached European art film done in his honour. Lolita munching on potatoe chips and sipping sugary soda “Do you ever watch any of those movies with um…subtitles?” “Yes, frequently.” “Meh, I don’t like ‘em”.

Humbert does act out his fantasies )behind the camera. Lolita says something about their relationship when he goes to give her money, and before that with Quilty calling the night he took her from the hospital talking about his sex life, and the Dr. Zef (school psychologist, not sure about the name) conversation about bringing in 3 psychologists to closely examine the home life of Lolita and Humbert as Sellers's character hints at the unorthodox relationship Lolita and Humbert have.

Sellers's character reminds me a lot of Andy Warhol with his art movies, "freaks", and odd behavior.

Heh, nice I want to see that Warhol movie. I meant that Humbert doesn't act out his fantasies until Lolita makes the first move, and then yes they are definitely doing the nasty (something I would pay to see).

ok, i was very confused, because that was the major theme of the film and novel. i am not sure if Warhol ever made any freaky films. i have seen Vinyl in italian (and i know a handful of italian words), and it was boring, and not freaky.

-